Friday, February 25, 2011

Set aside your politics and consider the cultural insight

OK, be warned. I am going to link you to a conservative blog where a conservative guy is trying to distinguish between conservative and liberal movies.

I honestly don't care if you skip most of it, but Kurt Schlichter's final riff on "Casablanca" really made sense to me. Here he isn't talking so much about political assumptions, but about very human ideas of what is most important and how that is conveyed on film. Yes, he's talking about "our civilization's survival" by the end of it, but the fight he's describing in this bit is not with external enemies, it's with ourselves.


[Rick: We’ll always have Paris. We didn’t have, we, we lost it until you came to Casablanca. We got it back last night.
Ilsa: When I said I would never leave you.
Rick: And you never will. But I’ve got a job to do, too. Where I’m going, you can’t follow. What I’ve got to do, you can’t be any part of. Ilsa, I’m no good at being noble, but it doesn’t take much to see that the problems of three little people don’t amount to a hill of beans in this crazy world. Someday you’ll understand that.]

Let’s assume there is still a director out there who would allow that many lines of dialogue in a row without a shaky camera jump cut. Even then, we’d still get Victor Laszlo as an uptight, probably Christian, creep with the unreasonable expectation that his wife not start banging another man just because she finds him sexy. Instead of sending her away, Rick would probably tell off Mr. Jesus J. Stickuphisrear, then he and Ilsa would jump on the plane together. Let other people deal with the Nazis – inconveniences like honor and duty just get in the way of validating one’s own feelings! Plus, they’d probably cast Ashton Kutcher as Rick and Katherine Heigl as Ilsa. And switch the location to Vegas. And change the Nazis into CIA agents. And make Sam into a streetwise hustler played by 50 Cent, who could also do a hip-hop version of As Time Goes By that somehow incorporates the phrase “my bitches.”

No, the fact is that sometimes your problems don’t amount to a hill of beans, that you have to make hard choices and do the right thing even where – gasp! – it might make you feel bad. Casablanca is easy to take because of great actors, a great script, and a great story, but its message is strong medicine. And, as we enter a second decade of (open) warfare for our civilization’s survival, it could not be timelier.


The sad thing is, I could see Hollywood making a crap version of "Casablanca" like the one he's making up here. Think that 1995 Demi Moore "Scarlet Letter." h/t Sarah

Thursday, February 24, 2011

"Rant" nails the problem in the old "mainline" churches

Clifford pokes those dark eyes and sharp teeth up from the murky waters 'round Baton Rouge to propose a drinking game, played with some resolutions passed by a church bureaucracy:

Team One, you take a shot of Crown Royal at the words, 'gender', 'sexual', 'orientation', 'government', 'Millennium Development Goals'.

Team Two, you down the Crown at the words, 'Christ', 'Jesus', 'God', 'Lord', 'evangelism', 'Christian'...

...That's 12 shots each, Team One. Some of you should probably sit down - you're looking a bit wobbly.

OK, Team Two, now's your chance. You only need 13 shots to take the game, and we're talking a Christian church here, so this should be a cakewalk for you guys.

"Christ": Sorry, no matches.
"Jesus": Awwww... nothing there, either.
"God": Nope. Looking like Team Two is getting a bit parched.
"Lord": And another strike-out.
"Evangelism": Nothing there. Sorry. One last chance, Team Two, but it's an easy one and should puts some points on the board. Ready?
"Christian": ...Nothing! Bad luck Team Two. You've been shut out...

UK madness: false tolerance devours the tolerated

Not content with imposing homosexuality on unsympathetic businesses and institutions, UK elites are now considering moves to punish gay-themed businesses for not catering to straights.

Ed West's piece in The Telegraph suggests that maybe, just maybe, we ought to tolerate some social prejudices and exclusions until simple human contact and persuasion can make changes.

"The Equality and Human Rights Commission is examining whether 'gay-only' guesthouses breach new laws designed to prevent people being treated unfairly in the provision of goods or services...

Discrimination exists in every aspect of life, whether it’s age ('no more than two children allowed into the shop') class ('no workman’s overalls') or sex, and in every branch of commerce where businesses attempt to attract a particular demographic and avoid another. [In attempting to regulate this]the law becomes a series of contests between identity groups. The only winners are lawyers and government officials.

The irony is that, under our equality laws, the Stonewall Inn could have been shut down on discrimination grounds, while the hiring of West Indian and Pakistani workers in the 1950s and 60s would have broken racial discrimination laws. It’s time we claimed the word 'discrimination' back for its original, morally neutral meaning, starting with a declaration that the state should start discriminating between what is and isn’t its business."

Wednesday, February 23, 2011

"Why we are still legislating abortion in SD"

Voices Carry blog

Representative Steve Hickey's report from the Statehouse in Pierre describes the current legislation, which passed the House and is now with the Senate. It requires actual physician input, medical information and a waiting period before an abortion can be performed.

It came out in the hearings that it is harder to get a vasectomy than an abortion under current law.

What closes the argument for me is this: those of us who oppose abortion assert, "This is wrong because it is destroying a human life;" those who defend abortion won't engage that point, as though it is not relevant.

Instead, they throw up a cloud of issues - women's autonomy, medical professionalism, privacy, sexual liberation, theocracy, choice, convenience - and if those don't seem to sway us they throw f-bombs and other garbage (I've been on the tag end of such).

Their array of issues is not a string of points supporting a coherent argument; they are a cloud of misdirection and disengagement from the central question of whether or not abortion takes a viable human life.

And that reality tells me that they are wrong.

SD hunters donate tons of meat to feed the hungry

News : Sportsmen feeding SD - Capital Journal Pierre, SD newspaper since 1881

98,000 lbs. in 2009, and game meat is much healthier than most of the stuff you buy in the store.

Blessings on this voluntary and abundant program.